KESIMPULAN DAN SARAN A.Kesimpulan 1.Analisi program perbaikan gizi masyarakat pada balita gizi kurang dan buruk di UPTD Puskesmas Temon I pada komponen konteks : a.Progam dilaksanakan atas dasar kebijakan kepala puskesmas tentang program inovatif. b.Program sudah disusun berdasarkan besarnya masalah, analisis penyebab dan analisi kebutuhan masyarakat. c.Tujuan program belum spesifik dan terukur. 2. komponen masukan : a.Dana bersumber dari bantuan operasional kesehatan, jumlahnya tidak cukup. b.Tenaga pelaksana gizi tidak cukup. c.Sumber daya pendukung tidak mencukupi. d.Bahan makananbelum sesuai. e.Peserta program diikuti balita gizi kurang dan buruk, ada balita dengan penyakit penyerta. 3. komponen proses : a.Perencanaan sudah sesuai. b.Koordinasi sudah dilakukkan optimal. c.Sosialisasi belum optimal. d.Pelaksanaan program kurang efektif. e.Pemantauan dan evaluasi belum optimal. f.Pencatatan pelaporan belum optimal. 4.a komponen produk : a.Hasil cakupan Status Gizi belum efektif. b.Program mampu meningkatkan pengetahauan gizi kesehatan. c.Program belum optimal merubah pola makan. d.Program mampu merubah kebiasaan cuci tangan menjadi baik B.Saran 1.Bagi tenaga pelaksana gizi dan programer agar melaksanakan kegiatan dan layanan sesuai dengan kerangka acuan yang sudah disusun. Pemangku kebijakan dan kepentingan agar memberi layanan yang cukup untuk proses kegiatan sehinga program dapat berproses efisien dan efektif untuk mencapai tujuan yang optimal. 2.Bagi Puskesmas dan pemerintah agar segera memenuhi kecukupan tenaga gizi, dana dan sumber daya pendukung untuk pelaksanaan program perbaikan gizi masyarakat. 3.Perlu adanya kerjasama lintas sektor dan program dalam memperbaiki giiz masyarakat sejak proses perencanaan sampai dengan evaluasi. 4.Perlu dilakukan kajian dan penelitian lebih lanjut tentang program perbaikan gizi pada masyarakat.

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A. Conclusion 1. Analysis of the community nutrition improvement program for under-malnourished and poor under-fives in the Temon I Puskesmas UPTD in the context component: a.Progam is implemented based on the puskesmas head's policy on innovative programs. The program has been prepared based on the magnitude of the problem, an analysis of the causes and an analysis of the needs of the community. c. Program objectives are not specific and measurable. 2. Component Input: a.Dana sourced from operational health assistance, the amount is not enough. b.Powerful implementing nutrition is not. c. Inadequate supporting resources. d.Food ingredients not suitable. e. Participants in the program are followed by underweight and poor nutrition toddlers, there are toddlers with comorbidities. 3. Process components: a. Planning is appropriate. b. Coordination has been done optimally. c. Socialization is not optimal. d. Implementation of the program is less effective. e. Monitoring and evaluation are not optimal. f. The reporting is not optimal. 4.A Product component: a. Nutrition Status coverage results have not been effective. b. The program is able to improve health nutrition awareness. c. The program has not been optimal in changing eating patterns. d.Program is able to change the habit of washing hands for good B.Suggestions 1.For nutrition implementers and programmers to carry out activities and services in accordance with the terms of reference that have been prepared.Stakeholders and interests in order to provide adequate services for the activity process so that the program can process efficiently and effectively to achieve optimal goals. 2. For Puskesmas and the government to immediately meet the adequacy of nutrition workers, funds and supporting resources for the implementation of community nutrition improvement programs. 3. There is a need for cross-sector collaboration and programs to improve community demand from the planning process to the evaluation. 4. Further studies and research are needed on nutrition improvement programs for the community.